Journal of Neurology Research, ISSN 1923-2845 print, 1923-2853 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Neurol Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://jnr.elmerpub.com

Original Article

Volume 16, Number 2, June 2026, pages 99-114


Can an Antidepressant Improve Motor Recovery After Stroke? A Meta-Analysis of Adjuvant Fluoxetine Reveals Both New Hope and Safety Concerns

Figures

↓  Figure 1. PRISMA flow diagram of study selection process for the systematic review and meta-analysis. PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Figure 1.
↓  Figure 2. Risk of bias assessment of included studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB-2) tool.
Figure 2.
↓  Figure 3. Comparison of fluoxetine dosages in relation to motor recovery outcomes. SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval.
Figure 3.
↓  Figure 4. Effect of fluoxetine treatment duration on motor recovery in post-stroke patients. SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval.
Figure 4.
↓  Figure 5. Effect of fluoxetine on health-related quality of life in post-stroke patients. SD: standard deviation; CI: confidence interval.
Figure 5.
↓  Figure 6. Incidence of new adverse events related to fluoxetine treatment in post-stroke patients. CI: confidence interval.
Figure 6.
↓  Figure 7. Publication bias was assessed using funnel plots for each outcome, including (a) duration of treatment on motor recovery, (b) dosage of treatment on motor recovery, (c) health-related quality of life, and (d) treatment-related adverse events. MHI-5: Mental Health Inventory-5; MADRS: Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale; EQ-5D-5L: EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels; PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire-9.
Figure 7.

Tables

↓  Table 1. Characteristics of Included Studies in the Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
 
StudyLocationSample sizeDiagnosisStudy designOutcomes and measurement
BI: Barthel Index; BDI: Beck Depression Inventory; EQ-5D-5L: EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels; FIM: Functional Independence Measure; FMA: Fugl–Meyer Assessment; FMMS: Fugl–Meyer Motor Scale; JTHFT: Jebsen–Taylor Hand Function Test; MADRS: Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale; MAS: Modified Ashworth Scale; MHI-5: Mental Health Inventory-5; MMSE: Mini-Mental State Examination; MoCA: Montreal Cognitive Assessment; MRC: Medical Research Council; mRS: modified Rankin Scale; NHPT: Nine-Hole Peg Test; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale; PHQ-9: Patient Health Questionnaire-9; PMD: Perimetric Mean Deviation; rTMS: Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; SF-36: 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; SGPALS: Saltin–Grimby Physical Activity Level Scale; SIS: Stroke Impact Scale; TICSm: Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status–modified; VAS: Visual Analog Scale; VFQ-25: 25-Item Visual Function Questionnaire.
Asadollahi et al, 2018 [24]Iran90Acute ischemic strokeDouble-blind randomized controlled trialFMMS (30, 60, 90 days); adverse events
Babul et al, 2017 [15]Bangladesh128Acute ischemic strokeRandomized placebo controlled trialRMI (30, 90 days); motor recovery domains
Bembenek et al, 2020 [8]Poland61Acute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke)Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studymRS (6 months); SIS (6 months); NIHSS (6, 12 months); MRC and Brunnstrom scales (arm/hand deficit); MHI-5 (mood); VAS (recovery); EQ-5D-5L (HRQoL); adverse events
Berends et al, 2009 [25]Netherlands10Chronic ischemic strokeA crossover, placebo-controlled (double-blind), randomized trialGrip strength and motor function (dynamometer)
Chollet et al, 2011 [26]France118Acute ischemic strokeDouble-blind, placebo-controlled trialFMMS (baseline–90 days); NIHSS, mRS, MADRS (baseline, 30, 90 days); adverse events
Dehghani et al, 2024 [16]Iran90Acute ischemic strokeDouble-blind interventional study with placeboBDI-II (depression); FMMS (90 days)
Dennis et al, 2019 [27]UK3,127Acute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke)Pragmatic, multicenter, parallel group, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trialmRS (6 months); survival (6, 12 months); SIS (health status); Likert scale (social function); VAS (recovery); MHI-5 (mood); SF-36 vitality (fatigue); EQ-5D-5L (HRQoL); adverse events
Dike et al, 2019 [17]Nigeria60Acute supratentorial ischemic strokeSingle-blind randomized controlled trialFMMS change (entry–exit); BI and mRS (entry–exit); adverse effects; adverse effects of fluoxetine
Gong et al, 2020 [28]China254Acute ischemic strokeDouble-blind and randomized controlled trialFMMS and mRS (30, 90 days); adverse events
Guo et al, 2016 [18]China267Acute ischemic strokeSingle-blind randomized controlled trialNIHSS (15, 90, 180 days); BI (90, 180 days)
Hankey et al, 2020 [22]Australia1,280Acute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke)Randomized, parallel group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trialmRS (6 months); survival; PHQ-9 (depression); TICSm (cognition); SIS (health status); SF-36 vitality (fatigue); EQ-5D-5L (HRQoL); adverse events
He et al, 2016 [19]China350Acute ischemic strokeSingle-blind randomized controlled trialNIHSS (15, 90, 180 days); BI (90, 180 days)
Krishnan et al, 2021 [20]India168Acute or subacute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke)Randomized, placebo-controlled, single-blind trialBI; NHPT; finger tapping (baseline, 45, 90 days)
Lehto et al, 2020 [29]Sweden1,373Acute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke)Randomized controlled trialPhysical activity (SGPALS, 6 months)
Lundstrom et al, 2020 [23]Sweden1,500Acute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke)Investigator-led, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel group trialmRS (6 months); SIS v3; NIHSS; MoCA; depression diagnosis; medication adherence
Lundstrom et al, 2022 [30]Sweden1,500Acute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke)Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trialmRS; SIS v3; MHI-5 (mood); SF-36 vitality (fatigue); EQ-5D-5L (HRQoL)
Marquez et al, 2020 [31]Mexico30Acute intracerebral hemorrhageDouble blind, placebo controlled, multicenter randomized trialFMMS change (0–90 days); NIHSS; BI; mRS
Mikami et al, 2011 [32]Japan83Chronic stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke)Double-blind randomized studyDSM-IV depression diagnosis; HDRS-17; mRS; FIM
Pinto et al, 2019 [33]Brazil27Chronic ischemic strokeDouble-blinded randomized clinical trialJTHFT; FMA-UE (motor); MAS; BDI; MMSE; rTMS side effects
Saadat et al, 2025 [21]Iran60Acute ischemic strokePlacebo-controlled, single-blind clinical trialNIHSS (motor impairment)
Schneider et al, 2023 [34]New York12Ischemic strokeRandomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, pilot clinical trialPMD improvement; visual field recovery; VFQ-25; mRS (3 months)
Shah et al, 2016 [35]India84Acute hemorrhagic strokeDouble-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized controlled clinical studyFMMS change (0–90 days); mRS; drug side effects
Tay et al, 2023 [36]Sweden1,369Acute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke)Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trialNIHSS (stroke severity); MADRS (depression/apathy)

 

↓  Table 2. Treatment Regimens Administered in Included Studies
 
StudyInterventions regimensControl regimenDuration of treatmentResult
FMMS: Fugl–Meyer Motor Scale.
Asadollahi et al, 2018 [24]20 mg per os (PO) of fluoxetine daily and physiotherapyPlacebo (microcrystalline cellulose) and physiotherapy90 daysFluoxetine significantly improved motor recovery compared with placebo.
Babul et al, 2017 [15]20 mg PO of fluoxetine daily and physiotherapyPlacebo (details not specified) and physiotherapy3 monthsEarly fluoxetine administration with physiotherapy enhanced motor recovery after 3 months.
Bembenek et al, 2020 [8]20 mg PO of fluoxetine dailyPlacebo (details not specified)6 monthsFluoxetine did not improve motor recovery or functional outcomes at 6 and 12 months.
Berends et al, 2009 [25]20 mg PO of fluoxetine single dosePlacebo (details not specified)Single doseFluoxetine showed potential effects on post-stroke motor recovery.
Chollet et al, 2011 [26]20 mg PO of fluoxetine daily and physiotherapyPlacebo (details not specified) and physiotherapy90 daysEarly fluoxetine combined with physiotherapy improved motor recovery at 3 months.
Dehghani et al, 2024 [16]20 mg PO of fluoxetine daily and physiotherapyPlacebo (microcrystalline cellulose) and physiotherapy90 daysFluoxetine improved motor function and supported sustained recovery after stroke.
Dennis et al, 2019 [27]20 mg PO of fluoxetine dailyPlacebo (details not specified)6 monthsFluoxetine did not improve functional outcomes but reduced depression and increased bone fracture risk.
Dike et al, 2019 [17]20 mg PO of fluoxetine daily and standard therapyPlacebo (details not specified) and standard therapy1 monthsFluoxetine if started in the acute phase of ischemic stroke may improve functional status. It also shows a positive trend towards enhancing motor recovery
Gong et al, 2020 [28]20 mg PO of fluoxetine dailyPlacebo (no anti-depressive medication)90 daysFluoxetine improved motor ability at 90 days based on FMMS scores.
Guo et al, 2016 [18]20 mg PO of fluoxetine dailyPlacebo (details not specified)90 daysEarly fluoxetine administration improved neurological functional prognosis after ischemic stroke.
Hankey et al, 2020 [22]20 mg PO of fluoxetine dailyPlacebo (details not specified)6 monthsFluoxetine did not improve functional outcomes and increased risks of falls, fractures, and seizures.
He et al, 2016 [19]20 mg PO of fluoxetine daily and standard therapy (20 mg/day atorvastatin)Placebo (details not specified) and standard therapy (20 mg/day atorvastatin)90 daysFluoxetine treatment improved long-term neurological functional outcomes after ischemic stroke
Krishnan et al, 2021 [20]20 mg PO of fluoxetine dailyPlacebo (details not specified)90 daysEarly fluoxetine treatment was safe and may enhance motor function in patients with severe motor impairment.
Lehto et al, 2020 [29]20 mg PO of fluoxetine dailyPlacebo (details not specified)6 monthsFluoxetine was not associated with increased physical activity levels after stroke.
Lundstrom et al, 2020 [23]20 mg PO of fluoxetine dailyPlacebo (details not specified)6 monthsFluoxetine did not improve functional outcomes but reduced depression and increased fracture and hyponatremia risk.
Lundstrom et al, 2022 [30]20 mg PO of fluoxetine dailyPlacebo (details not specified)6 monthsFluoxetine had no effect on functional outcomes and was associated with poorer memory and communication scores.
Marquez et al, 2020 [31]20 mg PO of fluoxetine daily and standard therapyPlacebo (details not specified) and standard therapy90 daysFluoxetine combined with standard therapy improved motor recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage.
Mikami et al, 2011 [32]10 mg/day for the first 3 weeks, 20 mg/day for weeks 4–6, 30 mg/day for weeks 7–9, and 40 mg/day for the final 3 weeks of fluoxetinePlacebo (details not specified)3 monthsFluoxetine improved long-term recovery from post-stroke disability.
Pinto et al, 2019 [33]20 mg PO of fluoxetine dailyPlacebo (details not specified)90 daysFluoxetine resulted in smaller motor improvements than placebo and may hinder beneficial plasticity.
Saadat et al, 2025 [21]Starting dosage of 10 mg fluoxetine orally daily, subsequently raised to a maximum dose of 20 mg daily + standard treatment (daily clopidogrel 75 mg and aspirin 80 mg)Placebo (details not specified) + Standard treatment (daily clopidogrel 75 mg and aspirin 80 mg)3 monthsFluoxetine improved motor status and overall health outcomes in stroke patients.
Schneider et al, 2023 [34]20 mg PO of fluoxetine dailyPlacebo (details not specified)90 daysFluoxetine showed a potential trend toward improved visual recovery after stroke.
Shah et al, 2016 [35]Starting dosage of 10 mg fluoxetine orally daily and later increased to 20 mg after a period of 1 weekPlacebo (details not specified)3 monthsEarly fluoxetine combined with physiotherapy improved motor recovery after hemorrhagic stroke.
Tay et al, 2023 [36]20 mg PO of fluoxetine dailyPlacebo (details not specified)6 monthsFluoxetine was ineffective in preventing post-stroke apathy despite effects on depressive symptoms.